Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Looking at 3 different skis
-
09-24-2020, 09:41 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 10
Looking at 3 different skis
Hey guys,
I am looking at 3 different skis at the moment. All around the 1200 to 1500 range. All are said to run and ready to go. Just wanted some opinions on these models. I know I would need to do a compression test and hopefully a water run although everyone is winterizing at the moment here. The 3 models are a spotless 2000 gtx rfi with 248 hours and battery charging issue. A 1997 GTX also with a charging issue that the owner thinks has a stator problem and will throw one in. I thought maybe it could be a rectifier. Typical Craigslist seller though. He is kind of a jerk and pushy for a sale. The other is a 1999 GTX that is red with a red hull. I am thinking it is around a 98 or 99. I will get more info on this one tomorrow. Just wondering if any if these I should stay away from etc. Any help would be appreciated. Just doing my homework before driving 40-50 miles to check them out. Thanks again guys.
-
09-25-2020, 12:16 AM #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
- Location
- Pearl River, LA
- Posts
- 24
- +1
- 3
Take the 1997 GTX. You'll be happier. Don't even look at the red one it is a 951. The RFI if it has not had a top end it needs one now.
-
09-25-2020, 06:28 AM #3
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Minneapolis MN
- Posts
- 1,210
- +1
- 198
You've picked a good hull to buy. Like mentioned above, the 951 engine in the '99 is known to be less reliable than the 787. They do have noticeably more power but the carburetion is finicky and the durability of the bottom end of the engine is not stellar. I would also avoid the RFI because special tools are required to diagnose and repair the system.
-
09-25-2020, 11:52 AM #4
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 10
Thanks guys, this is a great help. You guys have always been good. I had a 97 GTX in the past and this hull really works for us because there are always multiple riders and it is very stable in the salt water where I am located. Anything else would be greatly appreciated. I haven't heard back on the 951 yet but will call when I get out of work.
-
09-25-2020, 12:10 PM #5
I don't really have anything to add to Pro1200. He hit the most important aspects. I knew the 99 XP was a stay away from because of water ingestion with the 951, but did not know that there were issues with the 99 951 motor anymore than later years.
The only thing that you have to remember is that the 97 GTX has a known charging issue that will cost you some money to repair. At $1500, any repair will add a good percentage of your acquisition cost. As the original owner of a 200+ hour 03 DI unit, I would not write off the RFI if it is running well. Sure, if it starts acting up, you will be into it more than its worth immediately.
-
10-27-2020, 01:02 PM #6
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 25
- +1
- 1
I would want the 951 engine over the 787 personally. I have both a 96 GTX with a 787 and a 98 GTXL with a 951. You can feel the difference in power between the two and if I had to choose one, it would be the 951 ski.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
different looking skis
By kewpie79 in forum Kawasaki Open DiscussionReplies: 29Last Post: 10-23-2017, 09:05 AM -
CandooPro now works on all 2016 skis including the 300 HP skis
By Green Hulk in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 3Last Post: 04-06-2016, 09:04 PM -
New to skis, need help
By JohnMagee in forum TexasReplies: 2Last Post: 06-12-2014, 12:27 PM -
Extra skis or rented skis?
By GeoRXT in forum Mudbug Nationals PWC.Life RallyReplies: 24Last Post: 04-04-2008, 11:13 AM
Found the housing I had, it was also somewhat salty with peeling paint. I...
2008 limited 215 housing cracked